Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753269AbdIGBQf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:16:35 -0400
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:5988 "EHLO
        szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751267AbdIGBQc (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:16:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] Enhance libsas hotplug feature
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
References: <1504689314-20072-1-git-send-email-yanaijie@huawei.com>
 <57982db9-bfe8-cc7b-8aa7-0c3c83692d56@huawei.com>
 <20170906132225.GF28049@lst.de>
CC: <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <chenweilong@huawei.com>, <zhaohongjiang@huawei.com>, <hare@suse.com>,
        <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
        <Raj.Dinesh@microsemi.com>, <huangdaode@hisilicon.com>,
        <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <59B09DC7.3010206@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:15:51 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170906132225.GF28049@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.177.96.203]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
        refid=str=0001.0A090205.59B09DE8.0216,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
        ip=0.0.0.0,
        so=2014-11-16 11:51:01,
        dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 45efc6f9d13d121807e139d60a80e2ac
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 551
Lines: 18



On 2017/9/6 21:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:07:57PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> Regardless of the fate of the rest of the patches in this series, I think
>> patches 1,2,3,4,11/11 can be taken in isolation (subject to review, of
>> course). It would save maintaining them out-of-tree.
>
> I did a quick review of those and they all look fine to me.
>
> I'll try to find some time to review the real changes in the next
> days.
>
> .
>

Thank you very much and I'm looking forward to your suggestions
of the real changes.