Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932429AbdIGSoR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:44:17 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com ([209.85.161.170]:35524 "EHLO
        mail-yw0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932095AbdIGSoO (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:44:14 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7zyBDo3WdKzQSrutU/Rsund55lQpur6BZovNqHFotVwi2+189I/pdsvz+knCqAqCnBa4vEIhvMg6/uSQgQUCc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170830105524.GA2852@castle.dhcp.TheFacebook.com>
References: <20170829100150.4580-1-guro@fb.com> <20170829192621.GA5447@cmpxchg.org>
 <20170830105524.GA2852@castle.dhcp.TheFacebook.com>
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:44:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CALvZod5zP=LL=LhD0WX-zX4mPbn7F_obQmpCrrin9YuBQHJLow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: use per-cpu stocks for socket memory uncharging
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@fb.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 411
Lines: 10

>> As far as other types of pages go: page cache and anon are already
>> batched pretty well, but I think kmem might benefit from this
>> too. Have you considered using the stock in memcg_kmem_uncharge()?
>
> Good idea!
> I'll try to find an appropriate testcase and check if it really
> brings any benefits. If so, I'll master a patch.
>

Hi Roman, did you get the chance to try this on memcg_kmem_uncharge()?