Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264281AbTGGSWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:22:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267150AbTGGSWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:22:16 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:56512 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264281AbTGGSWC (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:22:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:36:36 -0400 From: Bill Nottingham To: Anders Karlsson Cc: LKML Subject: Re: rebased cpufreq patch? Message-ID: <20030707143636.B19538@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Anders Karlsson , LKML References: <1057571137.2584.5.camel@tor.trudheim.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1057571137.2584.5.camel@tor.trudheim.com>; from anders@trudheim.com on Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:45:37AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 735 Lines: 19 Anders Karlsson (anders@trudheim.com) said: > Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against > 2.4.22-pre3 ? > > I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and > cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without > any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so > if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great. I believe it's been integrated into the -ac series; that may be a better place to get it. Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/