Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932555AbdIGVcq (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:32:46 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:60068 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932373AbdIGVco (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:32:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 23:32:42 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Tristram.Ha@microchip.com Cc: muvarov@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz, nathan.leigh.conrad@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] Create new file ksz9477.c from KSZ9477 code in ksz_common.c Message-ID: <20170907213242.GR11248@lunn.ch> References: <93AF473E2DA327428DE3D46B72B1E9FD411218CF@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com> <93AF473E2DA327428DE3D46B72B1E9FD41121A06@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93AF473E2DA327428DE3D46B72B1E9FD41121A06@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3882 Lines: 127 On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 09:09:04PM +0000, Tristram.Ha@microchip.com wrote: > From: Tristram Ha > > Create new ksz9477.c file from original ksz_common.c. > > Signed-off-by: Tristram Ha > --- > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..bc722b4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c > @@ -0,0 +1,1317 @@ > +/* > + * Microchip switch driver main logic > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2017 > + * > + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for > +any > + * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the > +above Tristram It looks like something hand mangled this comment. "any" and "above" appear to be on a line on there own. > + * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. > + * > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL > +WARRANTIES > + * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF > + * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE > +FOR > + * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY > +DAMAGES > + * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN > +AN > + * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT > +OF > + * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "ksz_priv.h" > +#include "ksz_9477_reg.h" > + > +static const struct { > + int index; > + char string[ETH_GSTRING_LEN]; > +} mib_names[TOTAL_SWITCH_COUNTER_NUM] = { > + { 0x00, "rx_hi" }, > + { 0x01, "rx_undersize" }, > + { 0x02, "rx_fragments" }, > + { 0x03, "rx_oversize" }, > + { 0x04, "rx_jabbers" }, > + { 0x05, "rx_symbol_err" }, > + { 0x06, "rx_crc_err" }, > + { 0x07, "rx_align_err" }, > + { 0x08, "rx_mac_ctrl" }, > + { 0x09, "rx_pause" }, > + { 0x0A, "rx_bcast" }, > + { 0x0B, "rx_mcast" }, > + { 0x0C, "rx_ucast" }, > + { 0x0D, "rx_64_or_less" }, > + { 0x0E, "rx_65_127" }, > + { 0x0F, "rx_128_255" }, > + { 0x10, "rx_256_511" }, > + { 0x11, "rx_512_1023" }, > + { 0x12, "rx_1024_1522" }, > + { 0x13, "rx_1523_2000" }, > + { 0x14, "rx_2001" }, > + { 0x15, "tx_hi" }, > + { 0x16, "tx_late_col" }, > + { 0x17, "tx_pause" }, > + { 0x18, "tx_bcast" }, > + { 0x19, "tx_mcast" }, > + { 0x1A, "tx_ucast" }, > + { 0x1B, "tx_deferred" }, > + { 0x1C, "tx_total_col" }, > + { 0x1D, "tx_exc_col" }, > + { 0x1E, "tx_single_col" }, > + { 0x1F, "tx_mult_col" }, > + { 0x80, "rx_total" }, > + { 0x81, "tx_total" }, > + { 0x82, "rx_discards" }, > + { 0x83, "tx_discards" }, > +}; > + > +static void ksz_cfg(struct ksz_device *dev, u32 addr, u8 bits, bool > +set) { More mangling? Should set be on the end of the previous line? > +static void read_table(struct dsa_switch *ds, u32 *table) { > + struct ksz_device *dev = ds->priv; > + > + ksz_read32(dev, REG_SW_ALU_VAL_A, &table[0]); > + ksz_read32(dev, REG_SW_ALU_VAL_B, &table[1]); > + ksz_read32(dev, REG_SW_ALU_VAL_C, &table[2]); > + ksz_read32(dev, REG_SW_ALU_VAL_D, &table[3]); } > + > +static void write_table(struct dsa_switch *ds, u32 *table) { > + struct ksz_device *dev = ds->priv; > + > + ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_ALU_VAL_A, table[0]); > + ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_ALU_VAL_B, table[1]); > + ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_ALU_VAL_C, table[2]); > + ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_ALU_VAL_D, table[3]); } More mangling? } at the end of a line? I will stop reading now and wait for a v2 this is not corrupt. Andrew