DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 404C880484
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] perf ui progress: Make sure we always define step value
Date: Fri,  8 Sep 2017 14:05:07 +0200
Message-Id: <20170908120510.22515-2-jolsa@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170908120510.22515-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
References: <20170908120510.22515-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 939
Lines: 28

Unlikely, but we could have ui_progress__init being called
with total < 16, which would set the next and step variables
to 0. That would force unnecessary ui_progress__ops->update
calls because 'next' would never raise.

Forcing the next and step values to be always > 0.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-0zcvhmsmbhkfgoi7c670rq2x@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/ui/progress.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/progress.c b/tools/perf/ui/progress.c
index a0f24c7115c5..a9c15804b1f6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/progress.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/progress.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ void ui_progress__update(struct ui_progress *p, u64 adv)
 void ui_progress__init(struct ui_progress *p, u64 total, const char *title)
 {
 	p->curr = 0;
-	p->next = p->step = total / 16;
+	p->next = p->step = total / 16 ?: 1;
 	p->total = total;
 	p->title = title;
 
-- 
2.9.5