Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:27:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:26:54 -0500 Received: from mail.zmailer.org ([194.252.70.162]:54020 "EHLO zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:26:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 20:26:21 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel@kvack.org Subject: Re: Dual XEON - >>SLOW<< on SMP Message-ID: <20001102202621.D10002@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from drepper@redhat.com on Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:09:36AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:09:36AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > "Richard B. Johnson" writes: > > Yes. Look at the NMI count. Looks like every access produces a > > NMI. > > I'm seeing this as well, but only with PIII Xeon systems, not PII > Xeon. Every single timer interrupt on any CPU is accompanied by a NMI > and LOC increment on every CPU. Same happens with PIII CopperMine too. I have Asus P2B-DS board and 1 GB RAM. > CPU0 CPU1 > 0: 146727 153389 IO-APIC-edge timer > [...] > NMI: 300035 300035 > LOC: 300028 300028 /Matti Aarnio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/