Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265797AbTGHOrR (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:47:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267260AbTGHOrR (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:47:17 -0400 Received: from blackbird.intercode.com.au ([203.32.101.10]:57863 "EHLO blackbird.intercode.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265797AbTGHOrQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:47:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 01:00:00 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: Alan Cox cc: Andrew Morton , , , , , , , , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SELinux module to 2.5.74-bk1 In-Reply-To: <1057671907.4352.13.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 809 Lines: 24 On 8 Jul 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Maw, 2003-07-08 at 11:09, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Comparing the complexity (size) of this code with the q-n-d hash tables > > which are currently used one does wonder how useful it all will be. The > > additional indirections are not needed with q-n-d hashes. > > Are these new hashes immune to deliberate attack (witness the network > routing hash paper) This is just hash table management code, hash functions are supplied by the caller (e.g. they could use jhash). - James -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/