Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752150AbdIMKOC (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:14:02 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:6467 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751444AbdIMKN6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:13:58 -0400 From: Yisheng Xie Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Avoid ILLEGAL setting of STE.S1STALLD and CD.S To: Will Deacon , Jean-Philippe Brucker References: <1504167642-14922-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> <1504167642-14922-7-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> <738977bb-4cd7-7d86-0ea0-0c88b6af721c@arm.com> <20170913030643.GD12411@arm.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Message-ID: <2f952821-afc3-46dd-17eb-40e8626bd6e5@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:11:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170913030643.GD12411@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.29.40] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.59B90450.002D,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2014-11-16 11:51:01, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: eaac97f5f94b6b047243d4909bd1c3ff Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2478 Lines: 68 Hi Will, On 2017/9/13 11:06, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:54:19PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> On 31/08/17 09:20, Yisheng Xie wrote: >>> It is ILLEGAL to set STE.S1STALLD if STALL_MODEL is not 0b00, which >>> means we should not disable stall mode if stall/terminate mode is not >>> configuable. >>> >>> Meanwhile, it is also ILLEGAL when STALL_MODEL==0b10 && CD.S==0 which >>> means if stall mode is force we should always set CD.S. >>> >>> This patch add ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TERMINATE feature bit for smmu, and use >>> TERMINATE feature checking to ensue above ILLEGAL cases from happening. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie >>> --- >>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >>> index dbda2eb..0745522 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >>> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ >>> #define IDR0_STALL_MODEL_SHIFT 24 >>> #define IDR0_STALL_MODEL_MASK 0x3 >>> #define IDR0_STALL_MODEL_STALL (0 << IDR0_STALL_MODEL_SHIFT) >>> +#define IDR0_STALL_MODEL_NS (1 << IDR0_STALL_MODEL_SHIFT) >>> #define IDR0_STALL_MODEL_FORCE (2 << IDR0_STALL_MODEL_SHIFT) >>> #define IDR0_TTENDIAN_SHIFT 21 >>> #define IDR0_TTENDIAN_MASK 0x3 >>> @@ -766,6 +767,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device { >>> #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SVM (1 << 15) >>> #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HA (1 << 16) >>> #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HD (1 << 17) >>> +#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TERMINATE (1 << 18) >> >> I'd rather introduce something like "ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE" instead. >> Terminate model has another meaning, and is defined by a different bit in >> IDR0. > > Yes. What we need to do is: > > - If STALL_MODEL is 0b00, then set S1STALLD Yes, and within this case, we can only set the S1STALLD for masters which can not stall in the future? > - If STALL_MODEL is 0b01, then we're ok (in future, avoiding trying to use > stalls, even for masters that claim to support it) > - If STALL_MODEL is 0b10, then force all PCI devices and any platform > devices that don't claim to support stalls into bypass (depending on > disable_bypass). > > Reasonable? We could actually knock up a fix for mainline to do most of > this already. This sound reasonable to me. And I can be a volunteer to prepare this patch if Jean-Philippe do not oppose :) Thanks Yisheng Xie > > Will > > . >