Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752181AbdIMPFG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:05:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:44924 "EHLO mail-wm0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750962AbdIMPFC (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:05:02 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7GorzPp3yAB78is8eFT9lC6Erh96oe5b0Y6mzWVVHe+hNLFBjiYcms48X35Nn63o+yUy1FB7bpOp1EcjYBFh8= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170913034915.GA21161@kroah.com> References: <20170912165253.709627159@linuxfoundation.org> <20170913034915.GA21161@kroah.com> From: Tom Gall Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:05:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: LKML , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , linux- stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by nfs id v8DF5C50006233 Content-Length: 1319 Lines: 44 On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:27:45PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: >> >> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> >> Results from testing on Linaro’s small but growing test farm. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Summary >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> kernel: 4.9.50-rc1 >> kernel-repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >> kernel-branch: linux-4.9.y >> kernel-commit: edfaa5f69b96ae777b0acd2bfe1da26e21592001 >> kernel-describe: v4.9.49-15-gedfaa5f69b96 > > Howcome 'git describe' does not show 4.9.50-rc1? git describe looks for the most recent tag. Since there isn't a 4.9.50-rc1 tag, we get 4.9.49 + 15 patches etc. Does it make sense to create tags for the RC(s) so git describe gets it right? Given the right version is in the Makefile kinda feels like that'd be a belt and suspenders approach. -- Regards, Tom Director, Linaro Mobile Group Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs irc: tgall_foo | skype : tom_gall "Where's the kaboom!? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!" Marvin Martian