Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751499AbdIMVe2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:34:28 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:37783 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125AbdIMVe0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:34:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:34:24 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: David Lin Cc: Jonathan Corbet , rpurdie@rpsys.net, Jacek Anaszewski , hdegoede@redhat.com, Greg KH , robh@kernel.org, Rom Lemarchand , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] led: ledtrig-transient: add support for hrtimer Message-ID: <20170913213424.GA2493@amd> References: <20170913175400.42744-1-dtwlin@google.com> <20170913202032.GA30844@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1905 Lines: 64 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed 2017-09-13 14:20:58, David Lin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > These patch series add the LED_BRIGHTNESS_FAST flag support for > > > ledtrig-transient to use hrtimer so that platforms with high-resoluti= on timer > > > support can have better accuracy in the trigger duration timing. The = need for > > > this support is driven by the fact that Android has removed the timed= _ouput [1] > > > and is now using led-trigger for handling vibrator control which requ= ires the > > > timer to be accurate up to a millisecond. However, this flag support = would also > > > allow hrtimer to co-exist with the ktimer without causing warning to = the > > > existing drivers [2]. > > > > NAK. > > > > LEDs do not need extra overhead, and vibrator control should not go > > through LED subsystem. > > > > Input subsystem includes support for vibrations and force > > feedback. Please use that instead. >=20 > I thought we are already over this discussion. As of now, the support > of vibrator through ledtrig is documented > (Documentation/leds/ledtrig-transient.txt) and there are users using > it. I also thought we are over with that discussion. Yes, I'm working on fixing the docs. What mainline users are doing that? Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlm5pGAACgkQMOfwapXb+vLsQgCgm+d8OBMBssGf1X8bBhjcpHoA CxIAnRj3oY4psS4bQNOaZr2vzYPiQXkL =M/MU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--