Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751311AbdIMV5P (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:57:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:43448 "EHLO mail-pg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751153AbdIMV5L (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:57:11 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6qssYFtUU5m1pO58SAQffJ6FpDtdD/yh2PIvdrtv3n2sra9nJiYIJF8MBnnKmlgH3aPC4t1g== From: Kevin Hilman To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "kernelci.org bot" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , andy.gross@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/31] 4.4.88-stable review Organization: BayLibre References: <20170912165247.436880944@linuxfoundation.org> <59b8666e.cd5e1c0a.73fbf.2682@mx.google.com> <20170913010318.GB22427@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:57:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170913010318.GB22427@kroah.com> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:03:18 -0700") Message-ID: <7hshfqdzyj.fsf@baylibre.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1371 Lines: 36 Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 03:57:50PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: >> stable-rc/linux-4.4.y boot: 450 boots: 1 failed, 446 passed with 3 offline (v4.4.87-32-gb8c205d85576) >> >> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.4.y/kernel/v4.4.87-32-gb8c205d85576/ >> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.4.y/kernel/v4.4.87-32-gb8c205d85576/ >> >> Tree: stable-rc >> Branch: linux-4.4.y >> Git Describe: v4.4.87-32-gb8c205d85576 >> Git Commit: b8c205d855764e3db05a17ab4d03a19a5d609bdd >> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >> Tested: 68 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 34 builds out of 203 >> >> Boot Regressions Detected: >> >> arm: >> >> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: >> qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600: >> lab-baylibre-seattle: new failure (last pass: v4.4.85-16-gcd99a4f3f43b) > > Is this a real failure? I tried to boot this a few more times, and it's still failing so it apprears it's a new regression. Added qcom maintainenrs to Cc to see if they have any ideas. These failures with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING seem to be more often related to bootloader issues with kernel size than actual CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, so I'm note exactly sure which is which here. Kevin