Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751618AbdINJLH (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 05:11:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:45108 "EHLO mail-pg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751370AbdINJLG (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 05:11:06 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7QlgpKoq05p3SIfzJ5Q4HrWX6x1vJQDyRw+fHohmGz2Vh4REyw82694Vg+OfERvGubjhQN6g== Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:11:01 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Laurent Dufour Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, Tim Chen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/20] mm: VMA sequence count Message-ID: <20170914091101.GH599@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> References: <1504894024-2750-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1504894024-2750-5-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170913115354.GA7756@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <44849c10-bc67-b55e-5788-d3c6bb5e7ad1@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170914003116.GA599@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <441ff1c6-72a7-5d96-02c8-063578affb62@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170914081358.GG599@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <26fa0b71-4053-5af7-baa0-e5fff9babf41@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26fa0b71-4053-5af7-baa0-e5fff9babf41@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 167 Lines: 8 On (09/14/17 10:58), Laurent Dufour wrote: [..] > That's right, but here this is the sequence counter mm->mm_seq, not the > vm_seq one. d'oh... you are right. -ss