Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265713AbTGIGEO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 02:04:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265714AbTGIGEO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 02:04:14 -0400 Received: from f22.mail.ru ([194.67.57.55]:49165 "EHLO f22.mail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265713AbTGIGEO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 02:04:14 -0400 From: =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Andrey Borzenkov=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: printk in atomic context Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [212.248.25.26] Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 10:18:34 +0400 Reply-To: =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Andrey Borzenkov=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 434 Lines: 14 Is it possible (safe) to use printk in atomic context, i.e. under spinlock or inside of preemption-disabled region? The same question about 2.4 (here I guess only spinlock?) TIA -andrey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/