Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752022AbdINQCe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:02:34 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:5647 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751658AbdINQCc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:02:32 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,393,1500966000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="151874349"
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/14] Fix wrong %pF and %pS printk format specifier
 usages
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 00/14] Fix wrong %pF and %pS printk format specifier
 usages
Thread-Index: AQHTJ70wIi64LcWpK0ygf2zBB/bV/aKpo5OAgAAuq4D//8PTkIABZGEAgABFAQCAAIbhgIAIuRUAgAAGOwCAAAoQgIAADXCAgAAFrgD///KD8A==
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:01:55 +0000
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F613760F4@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <20170907093631.GD533@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <20170907095119.GE533@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <0604f27e-24ab-625b-9013-c6c0f4f6acc1@gmx.de>
 <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F6136C2ED@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <20170908061830.GA496@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <20170908172528.qc2vdtxzqh777k6o@intel.com>
 <67a0aad8-5412-60f8-6481-562d37995eb2@gmx.de>
 <20170914074044.GE599@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <20170914080302.GF599@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <404e94ca-36b3-8ea2-8ccc-e4a261b38416@gmx.de>
 <20170914092709.GI599@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <b2852124-2866-2302-cfdd-8fb22020938e@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <b2852124-2866-2302-cfdd-8fb22020938e@gmx.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.0.116
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by nfs id v8EG2et0014321
Content-Length: 249
Lines: 8

> let's hear from ia64 and ppc64 guys.

If you write a patch, I can try it on some ia64 h/w.

Please include some test cases (perhaps as a second patch that adds a few good/bad %pF and %pS
to some code (both in base kernel, and in a module).

-Tony