Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 04:17:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 04:17:45 -0500 Received: from kerberos.suse.cz ([195.47.106.10]:49414 "EHLO kerberos.suse.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 04:17:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:16:54 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Mike Galbraith Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: 2.4.2-ac12 unknown southbridge Message-ID: <20010306101654.A1281@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mikeg@wen-online.de on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:09:05AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:09:05AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > The driver forget what it always called a vt82c596b before. Reverting > the below brought it back on-line, and all seems well again. (hope I > don't receive any unpleasant suprises.. I've not the foggiest clue what > that number means;) > > - { "vt82c596b", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596, 0x12, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_66 }, > + { "vt82c596b", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596, 0x10, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_66 }, Can you verify it's a 596b and not 596a? Preferably by looking on the chip? This change was brought in because I wasn't sure for the 10 and 11 revisions. 586a doesn't have a functional UDMA66 engine and causes crashes if programmed to UDMA66. > 00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C596 ISA [Mobile South] (rev 11) It's the revision number - 11 in your case. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/