Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751904AbdINVZk (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:25:40 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]:49286 "EHLO mail-it0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751524AbdINVZi (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:25:38 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBjm9qBqbg0rdG0k9rKohd1UjHPbLRVDimsU/q2wULRTxaTvZGfiY9t0qgHpMmzaLGfM145yRKd9AD7/sGfpgo= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170908070943.GA26549@infradead.org> From: Kees Cook Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:25:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Qy0VExlM3UrQTaNp63ICWDIuBkM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14 To: James Morris Cc: Paul Moore , Linus Torvalds , LSM List , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mimi Zohar Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 535 Lines: 19 On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Kees Cook wrote: > >> How separable are the patches, normally? > > They're usually mostly separate, but may depend on some core LSM change, > or similar. > > Casey has mentioned off-list that it is useful to have a coherent up to > date security branch to work against when making core LSM changes. Yeah, for sure. This "merge all topics" tree is what I have for KSPP (and it's what I hand to -next). -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security