Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751443AbdIOKX7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:23:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:46407 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879AbdIOKX5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:23:57 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7mfSaSUsleeL1g2vs0XQ7jZEXQLOiD5AvgTNi8xFfyJBALb1B3s4+9knjPE+Fx9Cx2LTgW0A== Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:23:52 +0800 From: Leo Yan To: Kim Phillips Cc: Mathieu Poirier , Jonathan Corbet , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: coresight: correct usage for '/dev/cpu_dma_latency' Message-ID: <20170915102352.GA19208@leoy-linaro> References: <1503472998-9009-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20170823110528.ba272128cde46f40c71241cc@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170823110528.ba272128cde46f40c71241cc@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1922 Lines: 49 Hi Kim, On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:05:28AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 15:23:18 +0800 > Leo Yan wrote: > > > Cc: Kim Phillips > > Reported-by: Kim Phillips > > Thanks; typically only the latter is needed. > > > Set latency request to /dev/cpu_dma_latency to disable all CPUs specific idle > > -states (if latency = 0uS then disable all idle states): > > -# echo "what_ever_latency_you_need_in_uS" > /dev/cpu_dma_latency > > +states (if latency = 0uS then CPU Idle governor selects idle state0, so this > > +means 'WFI' is still enabled but other deeper states have be disabled, this > > +can avoid power off CPUs): > > +# exec 3<> /dev/cpu_dma_latency; echo "what_ever_latency_you_need_in_uS" >&3 > > not a fan of the "what_ever_latency_you_need_in_uS" (including and > especially the quotes which can create ambiguity in the user's mind): > just put a cut-n-pasteable example, clarifying the typically-default > value you chose, and its unit, in the text. > > More to the point, how did you test this? Are you sure that that the > value being echoed isn't being interpreted as a binary number? I checked for this with manually adding log in kernel function, if we use 'echo' command and input string with 4 chars length then the parameter cannot be parsed correctly by copy_from_user(); if input string with other length, the string will be parsed with hexadecimal format. > kernel/power/qos.c:pm_qos_power_read() looks to be looking for a 32-bit > binary integer, but I'm not sure if that's where it gets read. > > Certainly, this 2013 article uses a C example to write a binary integer: > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/65410 > > Please double-check, thanks, Thanks for the reminding. C code with 's32' type can pass correct value into kernel. Have sent new version patch, please help review. Thanks, Leo Yan