DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 2680F61464
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] kvm,mips: Fix potential swait_active() races
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
References: <20170913200824.28067-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <20170913200824.28067-8-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <0942aa56-47c7-5a21-4786-f97d38e74004@redhat.com>
 <20170913222236.GA29418@linux-80c1.suse>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <fcd8c065-1694-14b0-f06f-66362c148198@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:33:03 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170913222236.GA29418@linux-80c1.suse>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 412
Lines: 12

On 14/09/2017 00:22, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> has_sleeper*s*.  Can fix when committing.
> 
> So for regular waitqueues we have it singular, which is why I kept
> that name -- albeit sleepers() being better suited, yes. I don't think
> we want to rename it unless we rename all wq_has_sleeper() callers as
> well.

The typo is in patches 1 and 2.  Fixed those!

Paolo