Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751593AbdIOSrv (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:47:51 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:45756 "EHLO mail-io0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751201AbdIOSru (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:47:50 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD7P42FAqL2AfH9NlYolGRagBIMCjVhAge8oNzrvNSGBjhL21ziXoksyCwtmW6gojEGebO53YBZbETJoWBrCzc= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170915102219.GA4312@amd> References: <20170915065936.GA6580@amd> <20170915083901.aql6zkcabewy52kb@gmail.com> <20170915102219.GA4312@amd> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:47:49 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: K7TcGVImAF7_q2OaNTYT7lIxAf4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [4.14-rc0 regression] Re: x60: warnings on boot and resume, arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:257 initialize_ ... was Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix resume failure due to PCID To: Pavel Machek Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , Borislav Petkov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1934 Lines: 41 On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Let me pull latest... > > 711aab1dbb324d321e3d84368a435a78908c7bce > > (Strange. Not authored by Linus and old?) That's the author date, the committer date is new. Top of tree right now just happens to be a patch I applied, it's much more commonly a merge I've done. > But result is still similar, this time with more debug information. > [ 0.116813] x86: Booting SMP configuration: > [ 0.116893] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 > [ 0.004000] Initializing CPU#1 > [ 0.004000] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 0.004000] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:257 initialize_tlbstate_and_flush+0x2e/0xed > [ 0.004000] Hardware name: LENOVO 17097HU/17097HU, BIOS 7BETD8WW (2.19 ) 03/31/2011 > [ 0.004000] task: f5ca2080 task.stack: f5cc4000 > [ 0.004000] EIP: initialize_tlbstate_and_flush+0x2e/0xed > [ 0.004000] EFLAGS: 00210087 CPU: 1 > [ 0.004000] EAX: 0504b000 EBX: c4f15540 ECX: c4f15710 EDX: 00000000 > [ 0.004000] ESI: 04ee7000 EDI: f5ca2080 EBP: f5cc5f54 ESP: f5cc5f44 > [ 0.004000] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 > [ 0.004000] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 04ee7000 CR4: 000006b0 > [ 0.004000] Call Trace: > [ 0.004000] cpu_init+0xdc/0x2f0 > [ 0.004000] start_secondary+0x34/0x1c6 > [ 0.004000] startup_32_smp+0x164/0x166 > [ 0.004000] ? startup_32_smp+0x164/0x166 > [ 0.004000] Code: 56 53 83 ec 08 64 8b 1d c0 c0 03 c5 b9 10 57 f1 c4 e8 de 65 9e 00 89 45 f0 89 55 f4 0f 20 de 8b 43 20 05 00 00 00 40 39 c6 74 11 <0f> ff 50 56 68 74 9c d8 c4 e8 d1 cd 04 00 83 c4 0c a1 20 90 f8 > [ 0.004000] ---[ end trace 7439e29925a49b51 ]--- > [ 0.004000] # CR3: 0000000004ee7000, __pa(mm->pgd): 000000000504b000 Ok, clearly Andy didn't get the 32-bit SMP bringup path right. Presumable tested a 32-bit UP image, or in a single-cpu VM? Andy? Linus