Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932655AbdIRNjI (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:39:08 -0400 Received: from mail.sigma-star.at ([95.130.255.111]:45996 "EHLO mail.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932520AbdIRNjH (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:39:07 -0400 From: Richard Weinberger To: Boris Brezillon Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marek.vasut@gmail.com, cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr, computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Check for spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd() return value Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:39:25 +0200 Message-ID: <2454131.y020cBOLnt@blindfold> In-Reply-To: <20170918113945.1549571f@bbrezillon> References: <20170917095750.14059-1-richard@nod.at> <20170918113945.1549571f@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1385 Lines: 43 Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 11:39:45 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon: > On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:57:50 +0200 > > Richard Weinberger wrote: > > The function can return a negativ value in case of errors, > > don't use it blindly as array index. > > > > Detected by CoverityScan CID#1418067 ("Memory - illegal accesses") > > Fixes: f384b352cbf0 ("mtd: spi-nor: parse Serial Flash Discoverable > > Parameters (SFDP) tables") > > Hm, not sure but I think "Fixes:" should not be wrapped. Hmm, vi tried to be smart. ;-\ > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger > > --- > > > > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > > index cf1d4a15e10a..d71765739a93 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > > @@ -2145,6 +2145,9 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_bfpt(struct spi_nor *nor, > > > > params->hwcaps.mask |= rd->hwcaps; > > cmd = spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd(rd->hwcaps); > > > > + if (cmd < 0) > > + return -EINVAL; > > Why not returning cmd directly? I thought about that too but the only other user of that function also returns -EINVAL upon error. Maybe Cyrille can give more input whether we should propagate spi_nor_hwcaps_read2cmd()'s return values or not. Thanks, //richard