Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268552AbTGITbR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:31:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268553AbTGITbR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:31:17 -0400 Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com ([80.190.48.67]:30214 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268552AbTGITbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:31:12 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: ->direct_IO API change in current 2.4 BK Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 21:45:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Andreas Dilger , Andrea Arcangeli , Christoph Hellwig , marcelo@connectiva.com.br, Trond Myklebust , lkml References: <20030709133109.A23587@infradead.org> <200307092022.35295.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307092144.12423.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 23 On Wednesday 09 July 2003 21:13, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: Hi Marcelo, > No, I did not. > I applied it because, in my ignorance, I did not noticed it would break > the stable API. > I applied it because I wanted comments useful from people (Like hch and > others did). > Thank you very much for your flaming. Somewhere deep in my head I knew you'd say that :-( .. When I flame, it looks very different. It was not any kind of flaming or any kind of bad meaning or such, just a simple question because I was just curious! ciao, Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/