Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751529AbdIRUoh (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:44:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:50300 "EHLO mail-wm0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750769AbdIRUoe (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:44:34 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCN5vApPCAZVKCkDFv49OylAhy5I4J9+09p+K2fKg/ddkJeGPy/T+DaZpfWvTVKVzbnk8fR0Q== Subject: Re: Vibrations in input vs. LED was Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] led: ledtrig-transient: add support for hrtimer To: Pavel Machek References: <20170913175400.42744-1-dtwlin@google.com> <20170913202032.GA30844@amd> <9c75c3a9-4123-c7f3-7725-45ba752d672a@gmail.com> <20170914205804.GA24339@amd> <20170916015809.GA5072@localhost> <9afbd987-b237-24d4-e16a-ddd7fa70766a@gmail.com> <20170917175013.GB13003@amd> Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, David Lin , corbet@lwn.net, rpurdie@rpsys.net, hdegoede@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, robh@kernel.org, romlem@google.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org From: Jacek Anaszewski X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1010 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:43:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170917175013.GB13003@amd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1158 Lines: 33 Hi, On 09/17/2017 07:50 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>>> Do you think such an improvement could be harmful in some way, >>>> even if it was made optional? >>> >>> Of course, we can make LED timing accurate down to microseconds. It will >>> mean increased overhead -- for "improvement" human can not perceive. >>> >>> If someone has problems with LED delays not being accurate enough... we >>> may want to fix it. But that is not the case here, is it? >> >> AFAIR David was mentioning that the hr_timer support is perceivable > > He said that hr_timer support is perceivable _when he is driving > vibration motor_. Which he should not do in the first place. > > Yes, if the difference is perceivable with LED in non-crazy > configuration (*), we can take the patch. Is it? Do we have someone > not from Google observing it? > > Pavel > (*) emulating PWM using blink trigger counts as "crazy" :-) How about adding CONFIG_LED_TRIGGERS_HR_TIMER_SUPPORT, guarding the hr timer support in triggers (timer trigger could also benefit from it) with it, and adding "(EXPERIMENTAL)" tag to the config description? -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski