Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:15:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:15:14 -0500 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org ([204.107.140.52]:44293 "HELO twinlark.arctic.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:15:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 05:15:07 -0800 (PST) From: dean gaudet To: Jonathan Morton cc: Andre Hedrick , Linus Torvalds , Douglas Gilbert , Jeremy Hansen , Subject: Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-comment: visit http://arctic.org/~dean/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, dean gaudet wrote: > i assume you meant to time the xlog.c program? (or did i miss another > program on the thread?) > > i've an IBM-DJSA-210 (travelstar 10GB, 5411rpm) which appears to do > *something* with the write cache flag -- it gets 0.10s elapsed real time > in default config; and gets 2.91s if i do "hdparm -W 0". > > ditto for an IBM-DTLA-307015 (deskstar 15GB 7200rpm) -- varies from .15s > with write-cache to 1.8s without. > > and an IBM-DTLA-307075 (deskstar 75GB 7200rpm) varies from .03s to 1.67s. > > of course 1.8s is nowhere near enough time for 200 writes to complete. hi, not enough sleep, can't do math. 1.67s is exactly the ballpark you'd expect for 200 writes to a correctly functioning 7200rpm disk. and the travelstar appears to be doing the right thing as well. -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/