Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:34:22 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com,
        patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.12 00/52] 4.12.14-stable review
Message-ID: <20170919063422.GJ5430@kroah.com>
References: <20170918091016.620101134@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20170918142206.GA32319@sudip-tp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170918142206.GA32319@sudip-tp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 790
Lines: 21

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:22:36PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > NOTE: This is going to be the last 4.12.y kernel, after this one, this
> > branch is end-of-life, please move to the 4.13.y kernel tree at this
> > point in time.
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.12.14 release.
> > There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> Tested on our production hardware. There was no error in dmesg.
> Booted up fine, all functionality working.

What does "production hardware" mean, if I might ask?

Anyway, thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h