Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751641AbdISLki (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 07:40:38 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:36937 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751605AbdISLkg (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 07:40:36 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDebSr8zD+sUZd3NcRQ2x+S+eY+1iQyW0hhfqXSYYwxZEIwMuGUnbUyJiom2Sg7W3LFDlhkDA== From: Vince Weaver X-Google-Original-From: Vince Weaver Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 07:40:29 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: vince@macbook-air To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: perf: weird si_code results on overflow signal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 501 Lines: 15 On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Vince Weaver wrote: > I just compiled up a fresh git kernel and all of the perf_event_test > overflow tests are failing. > > The reason is that instead of getting POLL_IN or POLL_HUP sources as > expected, they are getting weird results in si_code of "-5". > > I haven't had time to bisect this, but I do notice that some major changes > to si_code handling went in with > 64a76d0d64bea159da997c002a916ffc03f98bfc resending in case everyone was away at plumbers... Vince