Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751804AbdISXNP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 19 Sep 2017 19:13:15 -0400
Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:34682 "EHLO
        out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751706AbdISXNO (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 19 Sep 2017 19:13:14 -0400
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
References: <87o9q65ynq.fsf@xmission.com>
        <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709191605370.31866@macbook-air>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:13:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709191605370.31866@macbook-air> (Vince Weaver's
        message of "Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:06:49 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <87shfi2sg3.fsf@xmission.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-XM-SPF: eid=1duRhR-0000uH-TZ;;;mid=<87shfi2sg3.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.200.44;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral
X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19Ryn/iBVjORckCSaJdOfRT3kNMAQ1hko0=
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.200.44
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com
X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
        *  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address
        *  0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available.
        *  0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
        *      [score: 0.5000]
        * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC
        *      [sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1]
        *  1.0 XMSubMetaSx_00 1+ Sexy Words
        *  1.2 XMSubMetaSxObfu_03 Obfuscated Sexy Noun-People
X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 
X-Spam-Combo: **;Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: 
X-Spam-Timing: total 5331 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.38 (0.0%),
        signal_user_changed: 4.5 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.8 (0.1%), parse: 1.28 (0.0%),
        extract_message_metadata: 26 (0.5%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.60 (0.0%),
        tests_pri_-1000: 9 (0.2%), tests_pri_-950: 2.3 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 1.86
        (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 25 (0.5%), check_bayes: 22 (0.4%), b_tokenize: 8
        (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 3.3 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all:
        2.3 (0.0%), b_finish: 0.87 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 1358 (25.5%),
        check_dkim_signature: 1.70 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 9 (0.2%), tests_pri_500:
        3897 (73.1%), poll_dns_idle: 3879 (72.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%)
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] brown paper bag fix for SIGPOLL si_codes
X-Spam-Flag: No
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 797
Lines: 23

Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> writes:

> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> When sorting out the si_code ambiguity fcntl I accidentally overshot and
>> included SIGPOLL as well.  Ooops!  This is my trivial fix for that.
>> 
>> Vince Weaver caught this when it landed in your tree with his
>> perf_event_tests many of which started failing because the si_code changed.
>
> I've tested with this patch applied and can confirm all of my tests now 
> pass again.

And in my tiredness and distractedness doing this on my honeymoon
I forgot to include:

Fixes: d08477aa975e ("fcntl: Don't use ambiguous SIG_POLL si_codes")

Not that there are any backport issues since all of this is new with
-rc1.  But just in case someone needs the information for double
checking me.

Eric