Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:06:53 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
To: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A patch slipped through the cracks?
Message-ID: <20170920150653.09f1a0d7@recife.lan>
In-Reply-To: <1505927837.26708.8.camel@v3.sk>
References: <1505927837.26708.8.camel@v3.sk>
Organization: Samsung
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 968
Lines: 29

Em Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:17:17 +0200
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> escreveu:

> Hi,
> 
> we're trying to get this reasonably trivial patch [1] applied for more
> than a year and four attempts now. (I'm not including it in this
> message so that this message won't be ignored for the same reason the
> submissions were, whatever they are.)
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/40862/
> 
> I have no idea what went wrong. There was a suspicion (somewhat
> confirmed by the initial patch submitter) that spam filtering could
> have dropped the first message. Since then the patch did make it to the
> list numerous times and was picked up by patchwork.
> 
> The patchwork's idea about the patch being "Superseded" is wrong -- I
> have no idea why. But someone *please* look into this and apply the
> patch.

Not sure what happened, but I tagged is as new. I'll take a look
on it later, when I start handling patches for Kernel 4.15.

Regards,
Maur

Thanks,
Mauro