Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751981AbdIUJXG (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 05:23:06 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:43516 "EHLO mail-qt0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751734AbdIUJXD (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 05:23:03 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBa08wLJpC1KuwCqMB2ZOyG6KnMfw7GRokjfDY56VHJ68fKkoT+6AiAJfwwDilYqvgUyefAujgvanJKrGeN/PA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170918120051.298bdabf@bbrezillon> References: <20170915140411.31716-1-romain.izard.pro@gmail.com> <20170915140411.31716-6-romain.izard.pro@gmail.com> <20170918120051.298bdabf@bbrezillon> From: Romain Izard Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:22:42 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: duAPxT4kaog8s8NZhWo0-mJIgx0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] mtd: nand: atmel: Report PMECC failures as errors To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Ludovic Desroches , Wenyou Yang , Josh Wu , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Cyrille Pitchen , Thierry Reding , Richard Genoud , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-mtd , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2095 Lines: 55 2017-09-18 12:00 GMT+02:00 Boris Brezillon : > Hi Romain, > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:04:07 +0200 > Romain Izard wrote: > >> It is not normal for the PMECC to fail when trying to fix ECC errors. >> Report these cases as errors. > > I'm not sure we want to have ECC error messages at this level. ECC > errors are rather unusual but not impossible, and sometimes it's even > not a real error (I'm thinking of bitflips in erased pages for > example, which are not necessarily detected/fixed in hardware). > > If we decide to print error messages when unfixable bitflips are > detected, it should be done in the nand-controller driver (somewhere > along those lines [1]). > > Regards, > > Boris > > [1]http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c#L827 > >> >> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard >> --- >> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c >> index 8d1208f38025..2a23f1ff945f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/pmecc.c >> @@ -687,6 +687,8 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_err_location(struct atmel_pmecc_user *user) >> * Number of roots does not match the degree of smu >> * unable to correct error. >> */ >> + dev_err(pmecc->dev, >> + "PMECC: Impossible to calculate error location.\n"); >> return -EBADMSG; >> } >> >> @@ -729,7 +731,7 @@ int atmel_pmecc_correct_sector(struct atmel_pmecc_user *user, int sector, >> ptr = ecc + byte - sectorsize; >> area = "ECC"; >> } else { >> - dev_dbg(pmecc->dev, >> + dev_err(pmecc->dev, >> "Invalid errpos value (%d, max is %d)\n", >> errpos, (sectorsize + eccbytes) * 8); >> return -EINVAL; > Ok, I will drop this patch.