Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752517AbdIXNMm (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 09:12:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:35811 "EHLO mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752499AbdIXNMk (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 09:12:40 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCUd5yPWnj1p6AjLk702on1A1wVgLzyK6hnqT1u0dESyQWhvmWxF2/hSoRlQ5HfXHN/f+y6hw== Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: spi-nor: cadence-quadspi: Add runtime PM support To: Vignesh R , Cyrille Pitchen Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Boris Brezillon , Rob Herring , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel References: <20170924105924.23923-1-vigneshr@ti.com> <20170924105924.23923-6-vigneshr@ti.com> <3a1160f9-a0ae-c84c-d209-af97c3c3b0f6@gmail.com> <4ee69ea4-14cc-4305-bf3f-8fe76d43bf6b@ti.com> From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:12:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4ee69ea4-14cc-4305-bf3f-8fe76d43bf6b@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 939 Lines: 27 On 09/24/2017 03:08 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > > > On 9/24/2017 5:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/24/2017 12:59 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >>> Add pm_runtime* calls to cadence-quadspi driver. This is required to >>> switch on QSPI power domain on TI 66AK2G SoC during probe. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R >> >> Are you planning to add some more fine-grained PM control later? > > Yes, I will need to add fine-grained PM control at some point. But, for > now SoC does not really support low power mode or runtime power saving > option. > The fact that driver still uses clk_prepare_*() calls to enable/disable > clocks instead of pm_*() calls makes it a bit tricky though. > > Just figured out I forgot to add cleanup code in error handling path of > probe(). Will fix that and send a v4. OK, fine. Cleanups are welcome. The SoCFPGA doesn't do much runtime PM either, so it's fine for now. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut