Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:03:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:03:45 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:44296 "HELO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:02:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 18:02:06 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch submissions Message-ID: <20010306180206.A4640@marowsky-bree.de> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.3i In-Reply-To: ; from "Alan Cox" on 2001-03-06T16:56:32 X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2001-03-06T16:56:32, Alan Cox said: > I'm getting a notable increase in people sending me patches that do major > things and should be 2.5 stuff. Please if you want to rewrite the VM completely, > redesign the scsi layer and the like wait until 2.5. When will 2.5 be forked? If anyone wants to redesign the SCSI layer, by all means, DO NOT STOP HIM! ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/