Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965852AbdIYTbb (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:31:31 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:33433 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965038AbdIYTb2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:31:28 -0400 To: Alim Akhtar Cc: Alim Akhtar , Bart Van Assche , "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "martin.petersen\@oracle.com" , Arnd Bergmann , "vinholikatti\@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <1503922783-14317-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> <1503935147.2841.25.camel@wdc.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:31:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Alim Akhtar's message of "Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:14:37 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 234 Lines: 12 Alim, > Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT() > macro? I fail to see the point of UFS_BIT(). So yes. Please make sure to CC: Subhash on ufs changes. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering