Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:13:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:13:36 -0500 Received: from ra.lineo.com ([204.246.147.10]:65186 "EHLO thor.lineo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:13:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3A01BB7D.B084B66@Rikers.org> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 12:07:41 -0700 From: Tim Riker Organization: Riker Family (http://rikers.org/) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?) In-Reply-To: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on thor/Lineo(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 11/02/2000 12:13:21 PM, Serialize complete at 11/02/2000 12:13:21 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > 1. There are architectures where some other compiler may do better > > optimizations than gcc. I will cite some examples here, no need to argue > > I think we only care about this when they become free software. This may be your belief, but I would not choose to enforce it on everyone. Thank you for you opinion. > > 2. There are architectures where gcc is not yet available, but vendor C > > compilers are. > > That need to run Linux - name one ? Why try to solve a problem when it hasn't > happened yet. Let whoever needs to solve it do it. We have proposals here all under NDA. So I won't mention one of them. Perhaps there are some of these folk on the list that would like to comment? > > Alan -- Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/ - short SIGs! All I need to know I could have learned in Kindergarten ... if I'd just been paying attention. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/