Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753988AbdIZCCS (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:02:18 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f193.google.com ([209.85.223.193]:35953 "EHLO mail-io0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751377AbdIZCCR (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:02:17 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCeGzCgs8Chmqi1d9AJpFoRxOxSoSWWWZsmt3upPDO8pxN7a34w1eCe87XaYCdFHAmn71MAggLlMv72o5jmo7I= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170926014656.GY32076@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20170926010036.GX32076@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20170926014656.GY32076@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 19:02:16 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IEuBsalH1maEW713wEfgEDvwlXc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git regression fix Re: Regression related to ipc shmctl compat To: Al Viro Cc: Kyle Huey , open list , "Robert O'Callahan" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 240 Lines: 8 On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > Which tree do you prefer it to go through? Direct to mainline, or vfs.git > #for-next? for-next, it's not like it's in any way urgent. Linus