Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269935AbTGKMyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:54:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269937AbTGKMyS (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:54:18 -0400 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:48525 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269935AbTGKMyS (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:54:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:08:59 +0200 From: bert hubert To: andries.brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: what is needed to test the in-kernel crypto loop? Message-ID: <20030711130859.GA15013@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , andries.brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 926 Lines: 24 Andries, You mentioned: [util-linux is waiting for this; when 2.6 comes out, or the first mount/losetup comes out that uses struct loop_info64, whichever comes first, struct loop_info64 must be considered frozen: a stable kernel must not change API and user space ABI must remain constant. This means that if cryptoloop is added later, some backwards compatibility is lost.] Is a newer losetup/mount needed to test the in-kernel crypto loop driver? The crypto-loop code is present in the bk repository, now. Thanks. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/