Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753046AbdI0N0M (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:26:12 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]:54734 "EHLO mail-yw0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752264AbdI0N0L (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:26:11 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCgm9fOzQhPIKVVnJlXcgxG/dgAWeQj01AXygqv0B1/ltAmpMns60QU4p+4W03/GkN+MbKKv0d5W94iFlAxozs= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170927121649.90557-1-glider@google.com> <1506516168.6617.38.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1506516344.6617.39.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:26:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tun: bail out from tun_get_user() if the skb is empty To: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Eric Dumazet , David Miller , Dmitriy Vyukov , syzkaller , Networking , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 536 Lines: 12 On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 05:42 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >>> Or something cleaner to avoid copy/paste and focus on proper >>> skb->data[0] access and meaning. > By the way I'm wondering if this is the only place where skb->data is > being accessed. > Isn't eth_type_trans() under IFF_TAP also touching it? Then we need to > check the size earlier. It is already checked.