Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753348AbdI0PwT (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:52:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:51378 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752407AbdI0PwR (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:52:17 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 8F0AB60708 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sboyd@codeaurora.org Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:52:10 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Tyler Baicar Cc: gengdongjiu , will.deacon@arm.com, zjzhang@codeaurora.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, bp@suse.de, james.morse@arm.com, geliangtang@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, austinwc@codeaurora.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, john.garry@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, zhengqiang10@huawei.com, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com, huangshaoyu@huawei.com, wuquanming@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: apei: Add SEI notification type support for ARMv8 Message-ID: <20170927155210.GF457@codeaurora.org> References: <1505373743-7780-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com> <88a71a70-0704-6e47-de09-6f67b91967b6@codeaurora.org> <8a622b5b-bcf1-3906-a4be-c3c86b0876fe@huawei.com> <18fe5348-d339-f505-4b1b-c35501f40acc@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18fe5348-d339-f505-4b1b-c35501f40acc@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 952 Lines: 24 On 09/27, Tyler Baicar wrote: > On 9/27/2017 6:05 AM, gengdongjiu wrote: > >Tyler, Stephen > > > >On 2017/9/27 3:23, Tyler Baicar wrote: > >>>Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng > >>Tested-by: Tyler Baicar > >> > >>Tested this functionality using SEA support. > >> > >>++Stephen, > >> > >>Something to be aware of, this patch will conflict with https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/14/663 > >>It may make sense to just remove the conditions for the NMI configs as part of this patch or in a series with this patch to avoid merge conflicts. > >In your patch, you only remove ACPI_APEI_SEA for the ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG, do you need to remove it for the HAVE_NMI? > From the latest comments it sounds like Stephen was going to remove > it from both. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/15/350 Sent it now. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project