Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751979AbdI0Rgp (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:36:45 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:44824 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751907AbdI0Rgo (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:36:44 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Levin\, Alexander \(Sasha Levin\)" Cc: Michal Hocko , "akpm\@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , Steven Rostedt , "David S . Miller" References: <20170927112723.16862-1-alexander.levin@verizon.com> <20170927150207.swmcarc4lqlklohr@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170927152445.pe5ah3hq5hwup75z@sasha-lappy> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:36:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170927152445.pe5ah3hq5hwup75z@sasha-lappy> (Alexander Levin's message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:24:48 +0000") Message-ID: <878th0vyas.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1dxGG9-0000CF-0l;;;mid=<878th0vyas.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.200.44;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+OT3cmeCbWr4x8qygiXtjXMpLh3ISFPQk= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.200.44 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -3.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;"Levin\, Alexander \(Sasha Levin\)" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 5303 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.0 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.1 (0.0%), parse: 1.01 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 14 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.83 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 5 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.20 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.99 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 15 (0.3%), check_bayes: 15 (0.3%), b_tokenize: 4.2 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 4.7 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.66 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.3 (0.0%), b_finish: 0.64 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 118 (2.2%), check_dkim_signature: 0.48 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.0 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 5141 (96.9%), poll_dns_idle: 5134 (96.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kill kmemcheck again X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 582 Lines: 16 "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" writes: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:02:07PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >>This is just too large to review manually. How have you generated the >>patch? > > Manualy. Note that most of it (~95%) is the result of 'rm arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck'. > > Otherwise, I just removed all uses of __GFP_NOWARN/SLAB_NOWARN, and calls to > various annotations throughout the code. Do you mean GFP_NOTRACK? GFP_NOWARN has a different meaning. > I'm not sure about i386 breakage, will take a look, doesn't seem to be too obvious. Eric