Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752074AbdI0R4E (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:56:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:44595 "EHLO mail-pf0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751263AbdI0R4C (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:56:02 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QB+iz+JC5DUnXqpunlcySPVI/Odk8tH9bRbnFZd+1sBEPZCwVckxdoAomAWKRSmHAz5y9nbCA== Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:56:00 -0700 From: Matthias Kaehlcke To: Nickey Yang Cc: mark.yao@rock-chips.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, mark.rutland@arm.com, airlied@linux.ie, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, seanpaul@chromium.org, briannorris@chromium.org, hl@rock-chips.com, zyw@rock-chips.com, bivvy.bi@rock-chips.com, xbl@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/rockchip/dsi: correct phy parameter setting Message-ID: <20170927175600.GL173745@google.com> References: <1506412523-1766-1-git-send-email-nickey.yang@rock-chips.com> <1506412523-1766-4-git-send-email-nickey.yang@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1506412523-1766-4-git-send-email-nickey.yang@rock-chips.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 7501 Lines: 195 Hi Nickey, El Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 03:55:19PM +0800 Nickey Yang ha dit: > As MIPI PHY document show, icpctrl<3..0> and lpfctrl<5..0> > should depend on frequency,so fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c > index 191037c..20d3f36 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c > @@ -267,10 +267,21 @@ > #define VCO_IN_CAP_CON_HIGH (0x2 << 1) > #define REF_BIAS_CUR_SEL BIT(0) > > -#define CP_CURRENT_3MA BIT(3) > +#define CP_CURRENT_1_5UA 0x1 > +#define CP_CURRENT_4_5UA 0x2 > +#define CP_CURRENT_7_5UA 0x6 > +#define CP_CURRENT_6UA 0x9 > +#define CP_CURRENT_12UA 0xb > +#define CP_CURRENT_SEL(val) ((val) & 0xf) > #define CP_PROGRAM_EN BIT(7) > + > +#define LPF_RESISTORS_15_5KOHM 0x1 > +#define LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM 0x2 > +#define LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM 0x4 > +#define LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM 0x8 > +#define LPF_RESISTORS_8KOHM 0x10 > #define LPF_PROGRAM_EN BIT(6) > -#define LPF_RESISTORS_20_KOHM 0 > +#define LPF_RESISTORS_SEL(val) ((val) & 0x3f) > > #define HSFREQRANGE_SEL(val) (((val) & 0x3f) << 1) > > @@ -400,32 +411,63 @@ enum dw_mipi_dsi_mode { > DW_MIPI_DSI_VID_MODE, > }; > > -struct dphy_pll_testdin_map { > +struct dphy_pll_parameter_map { > unsigned int max_mbps; > - u8 testdin; > + u8 hsfreqrange; > + u8 icpctrl; > + u8 lpfctrl; > }; > > /* The table is based on 27MHz DPHY pll reference clock. */ > -static const struct dphy_pll_testdin_map dptdin_map[] = { > - { 90, 0x00}, { 100, 0x10}, { 110, 0x20}, { 130, 0x01}, > - { 140, 0x11}, { 150, 0x21}, { 170, 0x02}, { 180, 0x12}, > - { 200, 0x22}, { 220, 0x03}, { 240, 0x13}, { 250, 0x23}, > - { 270, 0x04}, { 300, 0x14}, { 330, 0x05}, { 360, 0x15}, > - { 400, 0x25}, { 450, 0x06}, { 500, 0x16}, { 550, 0x07}, > - { 600, 0x17}, { 650, 0x08}, { 700, 0x18}, { 750, 0x09}, > - { 800, 0x19}, { 850, 0x29}, { 900, 0x39}, { 950, 0x0a}, > - {1000, 0x1a}, {1050, 0x2a}, {1100, 0x3a}, {1150, 0x0b}, > - {1200, 0x1b}, {1250, 0x2b}, {1300, 0x3b}, {1350, 0x0c}, > - {1400, 0x1c}, {1450, 0x2c}, {1500, 0x3c} > +static const struct dphy_pll_parameter_map dppa_map[] = { > + { 90, 0x00, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, max_mbps in this table is off by one. According to the databook the ranges for the date rate are: 80-89 90-99 ... 1450-1500 I think most people would interpret 'max_mbps' as the highest value of the range, not the first value outside of the range on the upper side. The code below 'fixes' this by using '>' instead of '>=' when looking up the configuration for a data rate: if (dppa_map[i].max_mbps > max_mbps) return i; Both the table and this check are confusing, just use the actual max value of the range and '>='. Also the current code wouldn't work with a max rate of 1500 Mbps, since (1500 > 1500) is false. > + { 100, 0x10, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, > + { 110, 0x20, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, > + { 130, 0x01, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_15_5KOHM}, > + { 140, 0x11, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_15_5KOHM}, > + { 150, 0x21, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_15_5KOHM}, > + { 170, 0x02, CP_CURRENT_6UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, > + { 180, 0x12, CP_CURRENT_6UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, > + { 200, 0x22, CP_CURRENT_6UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, > + { 220, 0x03, CP_CURRENT_4_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, > + { 240, 0x13, CP_CURRENT_4_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, > + { 250, 0x23, CP_CURRENT_4_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_13KOHM}, > + { 270, 0x04, CP_CURRENT_6UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 300, 0x14, CP_CURRENT_6UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 330, 0x05, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_15_5KOHM}, > + { 360, 0x15, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_15_5KOHM}, > + { 400, 0x25, CP_CURRENT_1_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_15_5KOHM}, > + { 450, 0x06, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 500, 0x16, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 550, 0x07, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + { 600, 0x17, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + { 650, 0x08, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 700, 0x18, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 750, 0x09, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 800, 0x19, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 850, 0x29, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 900, 0x39, CP_CURRENT_7_5UA, LPF_RESISTORS_11_5KOHM}, > + { 950, 0x0a, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_8KOHM}, > + {1000, 0x1a, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_8KOHM}, > + {1050, 0x2a, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_8KOHM}, > + {1100, 0x3a, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_8KOHM}, > + {1150, 0x0b, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + {1200, 0x1b, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + {1250, 0x2b, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + {1300, 0x3b, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + {1350, 0x0c, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + {1400, 0x1c, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + {1450, 0x2c, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM}, > + {1500, 0x3c, CP_CURRENT_12UA, LPF_RESISTORS_10_5KOHM} > }; > > -static int max_mbps_to_testdin(unsigned int max_mbps) > +static int max_mbps_to_parameter(unsigned int max_mbps) > { > int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dptdin_map); i++) > - if (dptdin_map[i].max_mbps > max_mbps) > - return dptdin_map[i].testdin; > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dppa_map); i++) > + if (dppa_map[i].max_mbps > max_mbps) > + return i; > > return -EINVAL; > } > @@ -507,16 +549,16 @@ static inline unsigned int ns2ui(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, int ns) > > static int dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi) > { > - int ret, testdin, vco, val; > + int ret, i, vco, val; > > vco = (dsi->lane_mbps < 200) ? 0 : (dsi->lane_mbps + 100) / 200; > > - testdin = max_mbps_to_testdin(dsi->lane_mbps); > - if (testdin < 0) { > + i = max_mbps_to_parameter(dsi->lane_mbps); > + if (i < 0) { > dev_err(dsi->dev, > - "failed to get testdin for %dmbps lane clock\n", > + "failed to get parameter for %dmbps lane clock\n", > dsi->lane_mbps); > - return testdin; > + return i; > } > > /* Start by clearing PHY state */ > @@ -537,13 +579,13 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi) > REF_BIAS_CUR_SEL); > > dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, PLL_CP_CONTROL_PLL_LOCK_BYPASS, > - CP_CURRENT_3MA); > + CP_CURRENT_SEL(dppa_map[i].icpctrl)); > dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, PLL_LPF_AND_CP_CONTROL, > CP_PROGRAM_EN | LPF_PROGRAM_EN | > - LPF_RESISTORS_20_KOHM); > + LPF_RESISTORS_SEL(dppa_map[i].lpfctrl)); > > dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, HS_RX_CONTROL_OF_LANE_0, > - HSFREQRANGE_SEL(testdin)); > + HSFREQRANGE_SEL(dppa_map[i].hsfreqrange)); > > dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, PLL_INPUT_DIVIDER_RATIO, > INPUT_DIVIDER(dsi->input_div)); > @@ -632,7 +674,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_get_lane_bps(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, > { > unsigned long mpclk, tmp; > unsigned int target_mbps = 1000; > - unsigned int max_mbps = dptdin_map[ARRAY_SIZE(dptdin_map) - 1].max_mbps; > + unsigned int max_mbps = dppa_map[ARRAY_SIZE(dppa_map) - 1].max_mbps; > int bpp; > unsigned long best_freq = 0; > int lanes = dsi->lanes; Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke