Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:46:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:46:08 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:1263 "EHLO brutus.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:45:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:44:52 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Kurt Garloff cc: Alan Cox , Subject: Re: Patch submissions In-Reply-To: <20010306192636.G5944@garloff.etpnet.phys.tue.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Kurt Garloff wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:22:58PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > I agree with Alan that we should keep all experimental stuff > > out of 2.4, > > Depends on the impact. Experimental stuff in MM, FS, ... [snip] > But, that's probably what you meant. *nod* > > probably even out of linux-kernel ... > > No. I want to see experimental stuff on l-k. That's what it's meant for. Putting the experimental stuff which isn't on l-k at the moment would probably triple the volume of this list, if not more ... I'm pretty sure most people already find l-k traffic too heavy to keep up. If you want to read all the experimental stuff of all the subsystems, why not subscribe to the mailing lists of those subsystems ? regards, Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/