Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:45:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:44:57 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:5648 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:44:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:44:34 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox cc: Andre Hedrick , Douglas Gilbert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > I don't know if there is any way to turn of a write buffer on an IDE disk. > > You want a forced set of commands to kill caching at init? > > Wrong model > > You want a write barrier. Write buffering (at least for short intervals) in > the drive is very sensible. The kernel needs to able to send drivers a write > barrier which will not be completed with outstanding commands before the > barrier. Agreed. Write buffering is incredibly useful on a disk - for all the same reasons that an OS wants to do it. The disk can use write buffering to speed up writes a lot - not just lower the _perceived_ latency by the OS, but to actually improve performance too. But Alan is right - we needs a "sync" command or something. I don't know if IDE has one (it already might, for all I know). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/