Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752729AbdI1L4B (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:56:01 -0400
Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:54538 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751474AbdI1Lz7 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:55:59 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBsoMjUJwckktaGrvIk8nZRFl539Jda9GfeNJUOfRPuoPqg+V/meVPd5yqaXtXPanBMU5muBQ==
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:55:55 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
        "sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com" <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        "rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: sched: serial port lockdep warning when offlining CPUs
Message-ID: <20170928115554.GB687@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
References: <CA+1xoqf6kLXzaBgwmaaqffju1WHPSQtDaxiub1Ag_MsTWcKb6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170928093847.zgcgvxb7ajiaywbr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20170928103032.GA2380@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <20170928113607.GB30818@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
 <20170928114528.wilknwkyjecqrcaa@sasha-lappy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170928114528.wilknwkyjecqrcaa@sasha-lappy>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 230
Lines: 8

On (09/28/17 11:45), Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote:
[..]

> Now I'm not sure what's your approach here, do we keep converting printk to printk_deferred one by one until we whacked every mole?

well... basically, yes.

	-ss