Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266774AbTGKVEO (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:04:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266778AbTGKVEO (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:04:14 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:15798 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266774AbTGKVD6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:03:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3F0F29A4.20408@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:18:28 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no CC: Marcelo Tosatti , Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre5 References: <16143.10146.718830.585351@charged.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <16143.10146.718830.585351@charged.uio.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 687 Lines: 28 Trond Myklebust wrote: >>>>>>" " == Marcelo Tosatti writes: > > > >> Is there still any chance for the NFS O_DIRECT support to make > >> it? > > > I guess the best way of doing so would be adding ->direct_io2 > > and KERNEL24_HAS_ODIRECT_2 define. IMO, yes. > That is what the last patch I sent you does (also sent to l-k). Should > I resend? Sounds like it :) Christoph, opinion? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/