Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752466AbdLBU0q (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2017 15:26:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:34505 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752149AbdLBU0o (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Dec 2017 15:26:44 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZWkdtotJ07Gp29ywB+2yTzGui6bFSwBJZjlHVOA5uMnK9NpRFARWfCoTMSEQaW09MPG455vw== Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] net: fjes: Handle return value of platform_get_irq and platform_get_resource To: Sergei Shtylyov , wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, michal.simek@xilinx.com, opendmb@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, Vladislav.Zakharov@synopsys.com References: <1512242782-7134-1-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> <1512242782-7134-9-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> <1bbebd1a-4cca-0ef0-bdc1-ae50a4218f30@cogentembedded.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org From: arvindY Message-ID: <5A230C7E.4050705@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 01:56:38 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1bbebd1a-4cca-0ef0-bdc1-ae50a4218f30@cogentembedded.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1543 Lines: 52 Hi Sergei, On Sunday 03 December 2017 01:36 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello! > > On 12/02/2017 10:26 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote: > >> platform_get_irq() and platform_get_resource() can fail here and >> we must check its return value. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav >> --- >> drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c >> index 750954b..540dd51 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c >> @@ -1265,9 +1265,19 @@ static int fjes_probe(struct platform_device >> *plat_dev) >> adapter->interrupt_watch_enable = false; >> res = platform_get_resource(plat_dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >> + if (!res) { >> + err = -EINVAL; >> + goto err_free_netdev; >> + } >> + >> hw->hw_res.start = res->start; >> hw->hw_res.size = resource_size(res); >> hw->hw_res.irq = platform_get_irq(plat_dev, 0); >> + if (hw->hw_res.irq <= 0) { > > This function no longer returns 0 on error, no need to check for <= 0. > >> + err = hw->hw_res.irq ? hw->hw_res.irq : -ENODEV; >> + goto err_free_netdev; > > gcc allows a shorter way to write that. > > err = hw->hw_res.irq ?: -ENODEV; Yes, you are right, But first is more readable. That's why I have used. > >> + } >> + >> err = fjes_hw_init(&adapter->hw); >> if (err) >> goto err_free_netdev; > > MBR, Sergei Thanks, ~arvind