Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129272AbQKBTYr>; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:24:47 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129307AbQKBTYh>; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:24:37 -0500
Received: from site3.talontech.com ([208.179.68.88]:14926 "EHLO
	site3.talontech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129272AbQKBTYW>; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:24:22 -0500
Message-ID: <3A01BF5A.30BC4B4@talontech.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 11:24:10 -0800
From: Ben Ford <bford@talontech.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)
In-Reply-To: <E13rPhi-0001ng-00@the-village.bc.nu> <3A01BB7D.B084B66@Rikers.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@pop.zip.com.au
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Tim Riker wrote:

> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > 1. There are architectures where some other compiler may do better
> > > optimizations than gcc. I will cite some examples here, no need to argue
> >
> > I think we only care about this when they become free software.
>
> This may be your belief, but I would not choose to enforce it on
> everyone. Thank you for you opinion.

No need to be so flip about it.  I believe that most of us feel that way.


-b


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/