From: Masaki Ota <masaki.ota@jp.alps.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?UGFsaSBSb2jDoXI=?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
        Masaki Ota <012nexus@gmail.com>
CC: "dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        "benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
        "aaron.ma@canonical.com" <aaron.ma@canonical.com>,
        "jaak@ristioja.ee" <jaak@ristioja.ee>,
        "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Support TrackStick of Thinkpad L570
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] Support TrackStick of Thinkpad L570
Thread-Index: AQHTaOzUDxdK9vCj+kGpYakFxrItJ6Mu/wiAgAOhCsA=
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:48:43 +0000
Message-ID: <TYXPR01MB07190FD0598129DE8EE892B3C73C0@TYXPR01MB0719.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20171129083358.5063-1-masaki.ota@jp.alps.com>
 <20171201210749.el6q62sc22jshwc5@pali>
In-Reply-To: <20171201210749.el6q62sc22jshwc5@pali>
Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US
Content-Language: ja-JP
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b6f39a1b-1eac-479b-4999-08d53ad24bee
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Dec 2017 04:48:43.2056
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 57e76998-77bd-4b82-a424-198f46eb2254
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: TYXPR01MB0718
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by nfs id vB44mwYK023964
Content-Length: 3106
Lines: 81

Hi, Pali,

I don't get your point.
Please modify the code if you have an idea.

Best Regards,
Masaki Ota
-----Original Message-----
From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2017 6:08 AM
To: Masaki Ota <012nexus@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com; benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com; aaron.ma@canonical.com; jaak@ristioja.ee; 太田 真喜 Masaki Ota <masaki.ota@jp.alps.com>; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support TrackStick of Thinkpad L570

On Wednesday 29 November 2017 17:33:58 Masaki Ota wrote:
> From: Masaki Ota <masaki.ota@jp.alps.com>
> - The issue is that Thinkpad L570 TrackStick does not work. Because the main interface of Thinkpad L570 device is SMBus, so ALPS overlooked PS2 interface Firmware setting of TrackStick. The detail is that TrackStick otp bit is disabled.
> - Add the code that checks 0xD7 address value. This value is device number information, so we can identify the device by checking this value.
> - If we check 0xD7 value, we need to enable Command mode and after check the value we need to disable Command mode, then we have to enable the device(0xF4 command).
> - Thinkpad L570 device number is 0x0C or 0x1D. If it is TRUE, enable ALPS_DUALPOINT flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masaki Ota <masaki.ota@jp.alps.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/mouse/alps.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c b/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c 
> index 850b00e3ad8e..6f092bdd9fc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> @@ -2541,13 +2541,31 @@ static int 
> alps_update_btn_info_ss4_v2(unsigned char otp[][4],  }
>  
>  static int alps_update_dual_info_ss4_v2(unsigned char otp[][4],
> -				       struct alps_data *priv)
> +				       struct alps_data *priv,
> +					struct psmouse *psmouse)
>  {
>  	bool is_dual = false;
> +	int reg_val = 0;
> +	struct ps2dev *ps2dev = &psmouse->ps2dev;
>  
> -	if (IS_SS4PLUS_DEV(priv->dev_id))
> +	if (IS_SS4PLUS_DEV(priv->dev_id)) {
>  		is_dual = (otp[0][0] >> 4) & 0x01;
>  
> +		if (!is_dual) {
> +			/* For support TrackStick of Thinkpad L/E series */
> +			if (alps_exit_command_mode(psmouse) == 0 &&
> +				alps_enter_command_mode(psmouse) == 0) {
> +				reg_val = alps_command_mode_read_reg(psmouse,
> +									0xD7);
> +			}
> +			alps_exit_command_mode(psmouse);
> +			ps2_command(ps2dev, NULL, PSMOUSE_CMD_ENABLE);
> +
> +			if (reg_val == 0x0C || reg_val == 0x1D)
> +				is_dual = true;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	if (is_dual)
>  		priv->flags |= ALPS_DUALPOINT |
>  					ALPS_DUALPOINT_WITH_PRESSURE;
> @@ -2570,7 +2588,7 @@ static int alps_set_defaults_ss4_v2(struct 
> psmouse *psmouse,
>  
>  	alps_update_btn_info_ss4_v2(otp, priv);
>  
> -	alps_update_dual_info_ss4_v2(otp, priv);
> +	alps_update_dual_info_ss4_v2(otp, priv, psmouse);

Now looking at this change... Is there reason why you are passing psmouse parameter there? Because struct alps_data contains psmouse member.

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com