Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753291AbdLDExs (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 23:53:48 -0500 Received: from mail.aperture-lab.de ([138.201.29.205]:57370 "EHLO mail.aperture-lab.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752060AbdLDExp (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 23:53:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 05:53:35 +0100 From: Linus =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCssing?= To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , Stephen Hemminger , "David S . Miller" , coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: ebtables: Avoid resetting limit rule state Message-ID: <20171204045335.GE3307@otheros> References: <20171125074418.16537-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> <20171127233008.GA1418@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171127233008.GA1418@salvia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1313 Lines: 40 Hi Pablo, Thanks for your reply! On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:30:08AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > index 61a9f1be1263..f74b48633feb 100644 > > --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ static int ebt_limit_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) > > { > > struct ebt_limit_info *info = par->matchinfo; > > > > + /* Do not reset state on unrelated table changes */ > > + if (info->prev) > > + return 0; > > What kernel version are you using? I suspect you don't have this > applied? I'm indeed using a 4.4.102 kernel, as LEDE is still in the process of updating to 4.14. So 4.4 with LEDE is where I got the measurement results from. > > commit ec23189049651b16dc2ffab35a4371dc1f491aca > Author: Willem de Bruijn > Date: Mon Jan 2 17:19:46 2017 -0500 > > xtables: extend matches and targets with .usersize And so, no I do not have this patch. I looked at it now, but it does not seem to have any relation with .matchinfo, does it? I also had a quick look at a 4.15-rc1 kernel in a VM now. I still end up in ebt_limit_mt_check() with the variables being reset when editing the table somewhere. Regards, Linus