Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752826AbdLDJz4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:55:56 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:53813 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752564AbdLDJzy (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:55:54 -0500 Subject: Re: Difficulties for compilation without extra optimisation To: Steven Rostedt , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Trond Myklebust References: <7f072f78-eef4-6d87-d233-cee71dac5a32@users.sourceforge.net> <1512314250.3673.6.camel@primarydata.com> <20171203162256.4ea0750d@vmware.local.home> <20171203214046.23b1937e@vmware.local.home> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <513fa42d-5d4a-1b6e-3164-3f06ac6e4901@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:55:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171203214046.23b1937e@vmware.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:I8hSn6xb10wCCzzDLmJUnpsVsRsPDJQzBNqzDhodo+x7LH0ux7K tjeG3X4woNkYxaEYSDnfz6dSeSEPGy59DjA0HxCVw0OzJmzaKCgjWJ7s+Ef2OdRz9hqwPry N6eyIfNDHH7WRPUkRHoAzjYg2SRF6UXwy/kaf+B//cQ1zYYfA8D1rlPsbLKI7EnvG6rggUF vM/jly3uEX0bDZNrvXChQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:0loNaAlEb3s=:BgC3YVaKbdqo7wIjYULE6t 0OeJ4V5Y1yO2G/4Tkt0TbkkYBV4r05LzfmWHPboYFuDR1No/Oxpg8nHgkeozqeFkEBiCUVPxj c1IzCWveZPsQjmGB5tloDqSSCU/pWhHKNtNAdlYgSxV4XXmQAT+6fKgRtToktsjcN53vtUrSW eDhhQBO1zBiDBb7ZuUEmarCl1A4aVdn/tKfcpXYyg3eDQqJEDnJWYnZS7O4ClQL2VibMj1jra N+h+rgFUv92pAeW0go0p4dIAewxLfno+a8jEKh4en9KdFaVrRmUW6uyV+kKMhRGeV9QhQ6Dxk Ayo8kx9zOvo5Zx4VR5IV+mAqB9kJ61dvaXbWanKeMdvpNEGcyhHdBlKmFhTnK78AeSlB5Cgwq sYG4gDaocXBEbYHjtyauic8Xd3DYf7/wt/2omeyjawmtEhVwRwPAnUFsUEStriBTBITuA2FYT foywZAowqFEgwVI1BThCHiw2Z1PpQZZpwbnE+nyP7XWtf2TLinyYKuKcmOId3m5nz5cAqqy/I +Vbzp38YjiFxabjhgcMcVCfkMjAoR9JkRwql5kT2iAooMcK+Ym6U7Qd0Z1+o/HSSXKqi1bX8s 1DBjhEBNfnyaL+WGW7z6f0d4wQ4FmLGPEKNyiRP6hf0wGsDYEw1jHULlDhtW3XkZCzrkKoKgj OCu+08fD9uUJcUVjMLFMOjT1Igt7+1TCA3fNP+DYUvlRy/4Mu22i+CpJhUmxFDoPJRhigoFHO ynroMjCCZ5ZhdjNb4R5DckWKbK8Oo6MU/wCp/MwHXft8ZPTJ2dFtemYPM4umw8s3+oTXrmyDv ibIgkRVFWra/apelUARPdiD/Jr4HprdWmHEIrjT41ehU19VGA4= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 541 Lines: 18 >> Can the software areas distinguished where such special handling matters? > > No idea. I would like to point another example out. > That's something you are going to have to figure out on your own. How do you think about information from an other clarification request for the topic “caif: Use common error handling code in cfdgml_receive()”? https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/7/486 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10046849/ https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<034c0760-b8af-0fe2-e7a0-81199ff31931@users.sourceforge.net> Regards, Markus