Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 16:32:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 16:32:38 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:47622 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 16:32:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 22:31:51 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Andre Hedrick Cc: Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Microsoft ZERO Sector Virus, Result of Taskfile WAR Message-ID: <20010306223151.W2803@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010306214838.V2803@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from andre@linux-ide.org on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:59:37PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 06 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > But I might want to do this (write sector 0), why would we want > > to filter that? If someone a) uses an email client that will execute > > java script code (or whatever) and b) runs that as root (which > > he would have to do, surely no ordinary user has privileges to send > > arbitrary commands) then he gets what he deserves. > > Jens we are not going there....the filter is the only way known to jam > unknown commands, and you missed the point of the issue then and I think > you still miss it. "arbitrary commands" + wrong hander is lock-up. I'm perfectly aware of the handler issue. So make it part of the user space taskfile interface in a nice way, done and done. And I knew I shouldn't have replied to this, the last thing I want to do is start another flamewar :-) So EOD from me. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/