Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752854AbdLDTPm (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:15:42 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:43201 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752065AbdLDTPl (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:15:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 22:15:22 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Marcus Wolf Cc: Simon =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sandstr=F6m?= , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux@Wolf-Entwicklungen.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: pi433: Rename enum optionOnOff in rf69_enum.h Message-ID: <20171204191522.dcwclu7v7fig65nc@mwanda> References: <20171203151726.16639-1-simon@nikanor.nu> <20171203151726.16639-5-simon@nikanor.nu> <20171204101737.xv4eyglsrbmiagtn@mwanda> <20171204103719.7talcb3dqu3yfns2@mwanda> <401fb0b7-48a9-dfc9-481b-d4e31f0ed9b5@smarthome-wolf.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <401fb0b7-48a9-dfc9-481b-d4e31f0ed9b5@smarthome-wolf.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1414 Lines: 46 On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 08:37:51PM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote: > > > Am 04.12.2017 um 12:37 schrieb Dan Carpenter: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:17:37PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > Perhaps choose different function names if you want? You could do it > > > as several patches: > > > > > > patch 1: change types to bool > > > patch 2: sed -e '/ == optionOn//' > > > patch 3: split the functions into two functions > > > patch 4: delete optionOnOff enum > > > > > > patches 1 and 2 could be merged together (your choice). > > > > > > > Markus says that optionOn is used by user space so my you won't be able > > to remove these entirely. But as much as possible we should internally. > > > > regards, > > dan carpenter > > > > Hi Dan, hi Simon, > > I think, it's a pretty nice idea to remove th optionOnOff and replace it by > bool. > > > In former times, the variables in the config struct had very different names > - not containing "enable". Therefore optionOnOff was used to make absolutely > clear (in user space), wheter something was switched on, or off. > Now the variable have nice names, so bool is fine, even better now :-) > > > I would suggest not to split the amp-functions but to rename them, to also > contain an enable: > rf69_set_amp_X_enable() That's a bad name, because it doesn't just enable it also disables. Please split them. regards, dan carpenter