Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270327AbTGMSK6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 14:10:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270328AbTGMSK6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 14:10:58 -0400 Received: from auth22.inet.co.th ([203.150.14.104]:58898 "EHLO auth22.inet.co.th") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270327AbTGMSK4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 14:10:56 -0400 From: Michael Frank To: Pavel Machek , Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 02:17:29 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: swsusp-devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1057963547.3207.22.camel@laptop-linux> <1058021722.1687.16.camel@laptop-linux> <20030712153719.GA206@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20030712153719.GA206@elf.ucw.cz> X-OS: KDE 3 on GNU/Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307140207.47711.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2055 Lines: 47 On Saturday 12 July 2003 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > - user can abort at any time during suspend (oh, I forgot, I wanted > > > > to...) by just pressing Escape > > > > > > That seems like missfeature. We don't want joe random user that is at > > > the console to prevent suspend by just pressing Escape. Maybe magic > > > key to do that would be acceptable... Dumb question applicable to 9x% of computers: how do you secure the suspend switch and OFF switch, not to mention the power plug or the battery? As to security many portables have a bios password and no other passwords thereafter for the user account. The abort feature events could be enabled via swsusp proc entry mainly for (desktop) security. Also, then you ought to think about securing suspend events (don't swsusp the webserver please)! In practice, when suspending, in many cases one would like to abort. Suspend should be abortable by ESC and post 1.0: the lid switch and/or suspend switch. If you think about it it makes sense to abort suspend instead of having to wait 15-40 seconds and reenter the bios password and wait another 10-30 seconds. (assuming 2.4 speeds) The way I would use S3/S4 is reboot only for a new kernel, and really use the machine portably much more. S3 would be used for short suspends and S4 for longer suspends. In short, this is an _important_ feature _as_ much as S3 and S4. Regards Michael -- Powered by linux-2.5.75-mm1. Compiled with gcc-2.95-3 - mature and rock solid My current linux related activities: - 2.5 yenta_socket testing - Test development and testing of swsusp for 2.4/2.5 and ACPI S3 of 2.5 kernel - Everyday usage of 2.5 kernel More info on 2.5 kernel: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt More info on swsusp: http://sourceforge.net/projects/swsusp/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/